Categories
- abortion
- abortion arguments
- abortion debate
- abortion facts
- abortion laws
- abortion services
- abortion statistics
- abortions
- Accounting
- advertising
- against abortion
- Arts and Crafts
- Automotive
- Business
- Careers
- Cooking
- Diet and Fitness
- Education
- Electronics
- Family
- Finance
- Food and Beverages
- Gifts and Holidays
- legal abortion
- marketing
- Office
- Pets
- Real Estate
- Science
- Self Help
- services
- Travel
Pages
Tags
abortion
abortions
act
anti-abortion
babies
baby
birth
born
choice
court
dilation
embryo
extraction
fetal
fetus
freedom
illegal
infanticide
infants
legal
life
live
Murder
NARAL
obama
of
Parenthood
partial
partial-birth
Planned
pre-born
pregnancy
pregnant
pro
pro-choice
pro-life
prochoice
prolife
rape
roe
suction
supreme
the
unborn
wade
Archives
Meta
|
July 28th, 2009 at 10:05 pm
no
References :
July 28th, 2009 at 10:31 pm
No.
References :
July 28th, 2009 at 11:05 pm
The president submits the budget to congress for approval, they propose their own and then they haggle over it. Then Congress passes something and the president either signs it or vetoes it. Either side has the opportunity to stand their ground on any issue they think is worth fighting for.
References :
July 28th, 2009 at 11:24 pm
I sure hope not. I think she needs to have a talk with Ségolène Royal so she really understands women’s issues.
References :
July 29th, 2009 at 12:06 am
She cannot. She can influence future decisions at the Supreme Court level by her appointments to vacancies, but those appointments have to be approved by Congress. If a president could just CHANGE abortion law, then it would have been done already. The budget is also something that must be approved and passed. This is always a factor in how much any President can actually follow through on what they SAY they will do. Having a Congress dominated by the opposition party is a huge factor.
References :
July 29th, 2009 at 12:11 am
For good or for wrong, a president canNOT change a Supreme Court ruling.
References :
July 29th, 2009 at 12:58 am
hun, she can’t even form a complete sentence NOR grasp the concept of what the vice presidents jobs is.
so the answer is NO!
References :
July 29th, 2009 at 1:39 am
She wouldn’t have the authority to repeal any laws. She could help control spending with her veto power.
References :
July 29th, 2009 at 1:59 am
She certainly will try. And many states have laws on the books that should Roe v. Wade be overturned, abortion would be criminalized.
Let’s look at what that would do…
I read an article on yahoo that when one country banned and criminalized abortion (in northern south america), women began dying in large amounts. largely in part, b/c doctors refused to do even routine procedures due to the fact that it *might* cause an abortion, to which they’d lose their license, their livelihood, and be sent to jail. the woman AND the fetus both died.
References :
July 29th, 2009 at 2:23 am
i think this sums up palin all in one picture. http://www.cafepress.com/politicop.327153923
References :
http://www.cafepress.com/politicop.327153923