Why does the government fund abortions?
November 132009
I think the one point everybody on the pro-choice and pro-life side on abortion should be able to agree upon is that the government should not be subsidizing the act of abortion (defined as the removal of a fetus from a pregnant woman’s body and the killing of that fetus). If we are going to have legal abortion, why not require women who choose to abort their babies to pay for it themselves instead of receiving a handout from everybody else? If women can’t afford the abortion, they can find a charity that will pay for it or just have their baby.
I don’t think anybody wants to increase the number of abortions (afterall, we don’t have enough babies being born as it is and abortion is definitely morally questionable), so why are we allowing the government to subsidize them?
What comes to mind when reading your question is if you feel ALL abortions should be illegal.
I would question the morality of one getting an abortion because they didn’t want a baby. There are plenty of options available for care of a baby through adoption.
You have to consider, however, that there are some who may seek an abortion for life or death medical purposes.
Just my thought!