The movie combines rare archival footage with present-day interviews to weave together two parallel stories: the evolution of underground networks to help women find safe abortions outside the law and the intensive efforts of activists and legislators who broke the silence and changed the laws.
The second of three documentations on abortion. This one is from 1995. Con subtítulo español.
Duration : 0:9:54
JD and Kim are trying to decide what to do with their unexpected pregnancy, but Laverne (and Jesus) have something to say. From Season 6, Episode 2.
Duration : 0:1:15
Excerpt of presentation by Dr. William Lile. More information on the video can be found at http://www.dyinglight.com. To reach Dr. Lile, go to http://www.prolifedoc.org. To order the DVD, visit http://www.dyinglight.com/store.
Duration : 0:4:29
I was walking down the street when I happened to come across some religious people protesting birth control pills and got into a little debate with them. What got me is how they were trying to hide their agenda behind the argument that birth control harms women. The lady told me the world is not overpopulated and that we can fit 6 Billion humans in Texas (of course, they would need 6 Billion plus gallons of water A DAY minimum, not to mention food grown from crops).
Duration : 0:9:23
This is an excerpt from episode 43 of Life Report responding to pro-lifers that believe that President Obama’s policies will reduce abortion rates more than McCain’s would have.
Full audio episode with more information at
http://ProLifePodcast.net
Supporting documents:
- Obama opposes the Hyde Amendment, which restricts taxpayer funding of abortions in the U.S. (Source: RH Reality Checks Questionaire that Obamas campaign responded to – http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2007/12/21/sen-barack-obamas-reproductive-health-questionnaire.)
- Obama just overturned the Mexico City policy, which bars the use of federal taxes for abortions overseas. (Source: ABC News – http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/International/story?id=6716958&page=1)
- Obama promised that his first act as president would be to sign the “Freedom of Choice Act.” (Source: Planned Parenthood website – http://www.imoneinamillion.com/. Here’s an excerpt of the video coverage that includes that quote – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf0XIRZSTt8)
- Obama opposed the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold a ban on partial-birth abortion. (Source: National Right to Life website – http://www.nrlc.org/news/2007/NRL08/PresidentColumnPage3.html)
- Obama has promised to appoint only pro-Roe justices to the Supreme Court. (Source: Glamour Magazine – http://us.glamour.com/magazine/2008/08/obama-interview?currentPage=5)
- Obama has called abortion a constitutional right “essential to women’s equality.” (Source: BarackObama.com – http://www.barackobama.com/2008/01/22/obama_statement_on_35th_annive.php)
As a state senator, he even opposed legislation (which the U.S. Senate passed in identical form by a 98-0 vote) to protect children who are born alive after failed abortions. (Source: FactCheck.org – Obama and ‘Infanticide’ – http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obama_and_infanticide.html)
Duration : 0:6:25
The Catholic Church has the condemned in, the whole world thinks it’s murder.
This video is dedicated to all those who didn’t have a chance..
I just hope and pray that this video pay touch one pregnant woman, and perhaps change her mind about abortion, because if this video suceeds in doing that, then the work i put into making it would be worth it.
Feel Free to Comment, Rate.
Say NO To Abortion!
Duration : 0:9:56
S.C. wants to (and is) going to pass a law saying that all women who want an abortion MUST view ultrasound pictures of the fetus first.
Duration : 0:2:20
Obama Repeats False Claim Abortions Haven’t Declined Under Bush / Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video. During the presidential forum on Saturday night, pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama repeated the erroneous claim that abortions have not declined under President Bush. The idea behind is the claim is to make it appear that pro-life policies don’t reduce abortions. During a discussion of abortion, Obama declared his support for the Roe v. Wade decision that allowed virtually unlimited abortions. Following his statement, he made the attack on President Bush’s pro-life policies. “The fact is that — although we have a president who is opposed to abortion over the last eight years — abortions have not gone down,” Obama said. Yet that claim doesn’t square with the latest national abortion numbers put forward by the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a research firm ociated with Planned Parenthood, the abortion business that has endorsed Obama. In January, AGI reported that the number of abortions nationwide have fallen to their lowest point in 30 years and have declined 25 percent since 1990 — with half of that time period coming under pro-life presidents. The number of abortions are now at their lowest point since 1.179 million in 1976, AGI said. Meanwhile, research from a nonpartisan political watchdog group finds the claim false when compared with national and state abortion statistics. The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania says that claims that abortions have not decreased under President Bush are “not true.” “Politicians from Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Howard Dean have recently contended that abortions have increased since George W. Bush took office in 2001,” the researchers have written. “This claim is false. It’s based on an opinion piece that used data from only 16 states. A study by the Alan Guttmacher Institute of 43 states found that abortions have actually decreased,” Annenberg indicates. “The claim is repeated by supporters of abortion rights as evidence that Bush’s anti-abortion policies have backfired, or at least been ineffective,” it added. “But the claim is untrue. In fact, according to the respected Alan Guttmacher Institute, a 20-year decline in abortion rates continued after Bush took office.” Video clip courtesy of Fox News. Others images and video clips from Fair Use and public domain.
Duration : 0:46:57
Partial-Birth Abortion Procedure Using The Real Instruments. Excerpt of presentation by Dr. William Lile. More information on the video can be found at http://www.dyinglight.com. To reach Dr. Lile, go to http://www.prolifedoc.org. To order the DVD, visit http://www.dyinglight.com/store. The partial birth abortion is not a rare procedure. It is, essentially, a variant of the even more common and equally gruesome Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) procedure. There are in fact absolutely no obstetrical situations encountered in this country which require a partially delivered human fetus to be destroyed to preserve the life or health of the mother (Dr. Pamela Smith, Senate Hearing Record, p.82: Partial Birth Abortion Ban Medical Testimony). People like Jill Stanek have exposed a practice, in which children marked for abortion are born alive and then killed. This is exactly where the logic of partial-birth abortion leads. On November 5, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. On April 18, 2007 the Supreme Court announced its decision to uphold the ban on partial-birth abortion. The procedure in question is properly called “partial-birth abortion” because, as even secular sources acknowledge, it requires the doctor to deliver the unborn child partially from the uterus, feet first, leaving the baby’s head inside the womb. The doctor then uses scissors and a hollow needle to empty the skull of its contents. The unborn baby’s head then collapses and the doctor removes the dead baby entirely from the mother’s body. Given the nature of the procedure, the congressmen who drafted legislation to prohibit it, the “Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 1995″, defined the procedure as follows: “an abortion in which the person performing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus before killing the fetus and completing the delivery”. The doctors who perform this barbaric act and those who seek to justify it attempt to hide its nature by describing it euphemistically as “intact dilation and evacuation/extraction” or as “intrauterine cranial decompression. “Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth” (PHACT), a group of more than 300 medical specialists organized to counter the misinformation provided by the abortion industry of the United States, pointed out: “Partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary to protect the health of a woman or to protect her future fertility; in fact, the procedure can pose grave dangers to the woman”. Many people argue that the anesthetics used in the process kill the baby, so death to the child is painless. However the American Society of Anesthesiologists testified to Congress that this is simply not true. On July 11, 1995, American Medical News (AMA’s official journal) submitted the transcript of a tape-recorded interview with abortionist Dr. Martin Haskell to the House Judiciary Committee in which he admitted: “…the majority of fetuses aborted this way (partial birth abortion) are alive until the end of the procedure.” As disturbing as this sounds, these are the facts. In this country medical doctors are partially delivering babies and then killing them. These babies are inches from being born. Many could be born and placed directly in the loving arms of childless couples for adoption. Instead, they are cruelly killed.
Duration : 0:4:30
Pro-Vie Abortion2